ontolog discussion forum (date)

ontolog discussion forum (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

December 31, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 18:42
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Chris Menzel, 17:47
[ontolog-forum] REGISTRATION OPEN: SICoP Special Conference, February 5, 2008, at CSC, Falls Church, VA, Niemann . Brand, 13:13
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 00:31

December 30, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 22:14
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 10:20
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Chris Menzel, 09:55
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 07:38
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 05:38
[ontolog-forum] SPARQL vs semantic sql, paola . dimaio, 02:31

December 29, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology Summit 2008 and DC-area OWL Events in April, Alan Ruttenberg, 16:08
[ontolog-forum] Ontology Summit 2008 and DC-area OWL Events in April, kendall, 13:21
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 10:05
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 06:12

December 28, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 19:17
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Duane Nickull, 18:59
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 18:50
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 18:14
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 14:31
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Duane Nickull, 10:37
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Duane Nickull, 10:34
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 07:54

December 27, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 11:17
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 10:41
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 08:28

December 26, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Randall R Schulz, 17:31
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 16:31
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Chris Menzel, 11:07
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universeof discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 08:56
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universeof discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 07:34
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 06:55
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universeofdiscourse" and individuals in the "real world", Christopher Spottiswoode, 03:06

December 25, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universeof discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 12:42
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universeof discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Azamat, 07:37
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Christopher Spottiswoode, 03:06

December 24, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John F. Sowa, 23:35
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 23:23
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 22:50
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 19:32
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Chris Menzel, 18:25
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Bill Andersen, 15:57
Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", Pat Hayes, 13:19
[ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world", John Black, 12:11
Re: [ontolog-forum] Business and industry structure ontologies, Stavros Macrakis, 07:41
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Niemann . Brand, 04:09

December 23, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] Info: Recruitment opportunities..., Peter Yim, 15:47
[ontolog-forum] Info: Recruitment opportunities..., John Bateman, 14:52

December 22, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] OntologSummit2008 wiki page has been initialized [was - Re: Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit], Patrick Cassidy, 22:22
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Bill Andersen, 17:50
[ontolog-forum] OntologSummit2008 wiki page has been initialized [was - Re: Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit], Peter Yim, 14:56
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, John F. Sowa, 10:07
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:40
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, John F. Sowa, 09:06
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:05

December 21, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, John F. Sowa, 20:11
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, paola . dimaio, 17:49
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Patrick Cassidy, 17:40
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, John F. Sowa, 16:06
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Chris Menzel, 15:08
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, John F. Sowa, 14:17
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Pat Hayes, 12:40
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Peter Yim, 10:32
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Patrick Cassidy, 10:10
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Patrick Cassidy, 09:59
[ontolog-forum] Autoreply: ontolog-forum Digest, Vol 60, Issue 13, kbender, 09:00
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Peter F Brown, 08:53
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, dbedford, 08:41
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Duane Nickull, 08:35
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Patrick Cassidy, 08:14
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Mala Mehrotra, 07:49
Re: [ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Peter F Brown, 06:54
[ontolog-forum] Start thinking about the 2008 Ontology Summit, Steve Ray, 06:45

December 20, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] CFP: Fifth International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, paola . dimaio, 18:38
Re: [ontolog-forum] Possibility of an OASIS TC for Electronic Document Interoperability, Peter Yim, 16:41
[ontolog-forum] CFP: Fifth International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Michael Gruninger, 13:32
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Dennis Thomas, 09:30

December 19, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] Neophyte question - modelling Alpha Taxonomies in RDF and Owl, Danny Ayers, 09:33
[ontolog-forum] Neophyte question - modelling Alpha Taxonomies in RDF and Owl, Christopher Rose, 08:49
Re: [ontolog-forum] Business and industry structure ontologies, matthew.west, 02:08

December 18, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 20:10
Re: [ontolog-forum] Business and industry structure ontologies, paola . dimaio, 19:40
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 13:12
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson, 13:01
Re: [ontolog-forum] Business and industry structure ontologies, Adrian Walker, 11:41
[ontolog-forum] Business and industry structure ontologies, Stavros Macrakis, 11:20
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 10:40
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 09:56
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Christopher Menzel, 09:16
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson, 08:29
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Jakub Kotowski, 07:15
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 05:28
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 01:07
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 00:03

December 17, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 23:28
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 22:43
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 21:48
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 21:29
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Cecil O. Lynch, MD, MS, 21:22
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 21:12
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 21:06
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 20:55
Re: [ontolog-forum] Six (Not So) Easy Pieces, paola . dimaio, 20:50
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), clynch, 20:45
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Gary Berg-Cross, 20:29
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 20:27
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Bill Andersen, 20:13
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Bill Andersen, 20:09
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 20:09
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 20:07
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 20:07
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Bill Andersen, 19:57
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 19:53
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Bill Andersen, 19:48
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 19:44
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Bill Andersen, 19:29
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 19:20
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 19:03
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 18:47
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 16:57
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 16:55
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Jerry Hobbs, 16:29
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 15:41
[ontolog-forum] Six (Not So) Easy Pieces, Christopher Menzel, 12:46
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson, 09:53
[ontolog-forum] 2nd CFP: FOMI 2008, Stefano Borgo, 09:08
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Dennis L. Thomas, 09:00
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Randall R Schulz, 08:57
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson, 08:27
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Chris Menzel, 07:57
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Chris Menzel, 07:48
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Randall R Schulz, 07:24
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson, 06:01

December 16, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 23:30
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 23:19
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 22:42
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 22:34
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 21:31
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, John F. Sowa, 19:50
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Christopher Menzel, 15:47
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 04:46

December 15, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Christopher Menzel, 22:52
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 22:51
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, John F. Sowa, 20:14
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 20:14
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 18:16
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 18:05
[ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: Imagery in Scientific Thought, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, 15:18
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, John F. Sowa, 14:54
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Stavros Macrakis, 10:14
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Pat Hayes, 10:11
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Dennis Thomas, 09:29
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Randall R Schulz, 07:25
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Dennis L. Thomas, 07:21
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, KCliffer, 06:32
Re: [ontolog-forum] Possibility of an OASIS TC for Electronic Document Interoperability, paola . dimaio, 05:33
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 00:42
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 00:35

December 14, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson, 22:55
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, paola . dimaio, 21:36
[ontolog-forum] Proceedings: OKMDS - "Making Better Strategic Decisions ..." - Thu 2007.12.13 session - a joint NASA-Ontolog-KMWG "OKMDS" mini-series event, Peter Yim, 10:21
Re: [ontolog-forum] Existentials (WAS: Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 06:35
Re: [ontolog-forum] Existentials (WAS: Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 06:17
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, Bill Andersen, 06:03
[ontolog-forum] Fwd: ISCRAM2008 Session Chair Info: Extended Deadline / Registration open, paola . dimaio, 05:37

December 13, 2007

[ontolog-forum] Existentials (WAS: Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 23:17
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 22:24
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 21:50
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 21:31
Re: [ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, paola . dimaio, 21:08
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 20:15
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 19:59
[ontolog-forum] Imagery in Scientific Thought, John F. Sowa, 19:44
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Chris Menzel, 18:44
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Steve Newcomb, 13:41
Re: [ontolog-forum] Possibility of an OASIS TC for Electronic Document Interoperability, Matteo Busanelli (ENEA-XLab), 06:14

December 12, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 18:07
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), jayanosy, 14:01
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 13:21
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 10:58
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Randall R Schulz, 10:40
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 10:29
Re: [ontolog-forum] Possibility of an OASIS TC for Electronic Document Interoperability, Matteo Busanelli (ENEA-XLab), 08:30

December 11, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 12:09
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Ingvar Johansson, 11:44
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 10:04
Re: [ontolog-forum] Possibility of an OASIS TC for Electronic Document Interoperability, Duane Nickull, 09:42
Re: [ontolog-forum] [ubl] Scope of SAP patents related to UBL and ebXML, Peter Yim, 09:20
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Christopher Menzel, 08:43
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Ingvar Johansson, 07:15
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 07:02
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Ingvar Johansson, 06:32
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 06:18
[ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, 06:15
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 05:10
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 04:33
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 03:47
Re: [ontolog-forum] Possibility of an OASIS TC for Electronic Document Interoperability, Peter Yim, 03:30
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Patrick Cassidy, 00:27

December 10, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:59
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:55
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Stavros Macrakis, 10:43
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Duane Nickull, 10:22
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 10:05
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Duane Nickull, 09:24
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), aarsic, 08:49
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Christopher Menzel, 08:35
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Ingvar Johansson, 06:55
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 06:49
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Ingvar Johansson, 06:00
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), aarsic, 04:08
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 03:52
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 03:45
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), aarsic, 03:19
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 03:02

December 09, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 23:11
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, 18:20
[ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, 18:18
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 18:13
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Christopher Menzel, 17:39
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Christopher Menzel, 17:15
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa, 16:22
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, 13:19
Re: [ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), aarsic, 09:03
[ontolog-forum] [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, 08:07
[ontolog-forum] Proceedings: Ontolog invited Speaker - Professor Mark Musen on NCBO-BioPortal - Thu 2007.12.06, Peter Yim, 07:20
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 00:20

December 08, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Wacek Kusnierczyk, 23:48
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Christopher Menzel, 17:31

December 07, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 04:59

December 06, 2007

[ontolog-forum] FW: Joslyn speaks at NSF on graph theoretic approaches to ontology creation / merging, Fri. Dec. 7, Room 1150 at 1:30 PM, Olken, Frank, 11:26
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes, 09:19

December 05, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 21:40
[ontolog-forum] ANN: The Open Web, Billion Triples Challenge, Peter Mika, 08:03
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:23
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson, 06:14
Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio, 01:59

December 03, 2007

[ontolog-forum] Fwd: ISCRAM2008 - Ontologies for Crisis Management - CFP due 21 December 2007, paola . dimaio, 21:06

December 01, 2007

Re: [ontolog-forum] formal systems, common logic and lbase, rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:57