>On Wednesday 12 December 2007 10:29, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> > ...
>>
>> Apparently the point of my comment about QT has
>> not quite got through. There is only one actual
>> scientific theory of quantum theory (actually
>> quantum electrodynamics, aka QED).
>
>You have to include quantum chromodynamics (the counterpart of QED that
>describes nuclear matter, including quarks and gluons and other
>bosons), too, right? (01)
I guess. Im not completely sure if any of the
'interpretations' cover the whole shebang, to
tell you the truth. But as there are no
'intuitive' phenomena involving nuclear matter to
explain, I wonder if it matters. (02)
>The current term for all of quantum theory is now the "Standard Model." (03)
Ah, I like that. (04)
Pat (05)
>
>
>> ...
>>
>> Pat
>
>
>Randall Schulz
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (06)
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|