|To:||"Pat Hayes" <phayes@xxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:35:18 +0700|
I am working on a deadline so can only pay cursory attention however - I find many points you mention worthy
of digging deeper for learning purposes, considering you may have some knowledge there
There is only one actual
And what does it say exactly?
or better, what do you make of it?
That is, what 'laws' and principles do we infer from QED and what impact/implications does the scientific
theory of QED have on the rest of the scientific body of knowledge?
To repeat: there is
Correct me if I am wrong: you are saying here that there is no such thing as 'quantum logic', but only 'quantum mathematics'?
The oldest one, which has found
Paola Di Maio
School of IT
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson|
|Next by Date:|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|