To: | "Pat Hayes" <phayes@xxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:35:18 +0700 |
Message-id: | <c09b00eb0712150035t1a1914acn8524c791b6f17a8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Pat - I am working on a deadline so can only pay cursory attention however - I find many points you mention worthy of digging deeper for learning purposes, considering you may have some knowledge there There is only one actual And what does it say exactly? or better, what do you make of it? That is, what 'laws' and principles do we infer from QED and what impact/implications does the scientific theory of QED have on the rest of the scientific body of knowledge? To repeat: there is Correct me if I am wrong: you are saying here that there is no such thing as 'quantum logic', but only 'quantum mathematics'? please elaborate thanks PDM The oldest one, which has found -- Paola Di Maio School of IT www.mfu.ac.th ********************************************* _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Deborah MacPherson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), paola . dimaio |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Pat Hayes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |