|Date:||Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:11:35 +0700|
No, he did not say that. I did. He said:
>>>You choose your favorite scientific mythology at this point.
to which I reply, that you (we) choose your favourite scientific method to start with anyway -
I was referring to 'falsifiability' as regard by some as an essential requirement for an experiment to be scientifically valid, and as totally absurd by others, especially in the light of quantum theory, where the same conditions are likely never to be repeatable in an experiment. I am interested opinions on falsifiability btw -
- 'what about if the latter predictions are not identical because the conditions of the experiments are not identical when repeated, the chances of which are very likely when you consider reality in its subatomic complexity?
Each scientist loves her favorite
thats exactly and solely what I meant with my statement
Eventually, someone comes up with a story
yes, and someone comes up with a story and matsh that disagrees with the expertimental evidence, haven't you noticed?
we got all the time in the world (.mid)
regarding the maths, well, as I learn on this list (thanks ) it is only a formalism to express the logic - so its ' quantum logic' that is exciting and challenging to me
Paola Di Maio
School of IT
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Kathryn Blackmond Laskey|
|Next by Date:|
|Previous by Thread:|
|Next by Thread:|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|