To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:11:35 +0700 |
Message-id: | <c09b00eb0712092311u1f840569r7461c3f471d9ce31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi Kathrin
No, he did not say that. I did. He said: >>>You choose your favorite scientific mythology at this point. to which I reply, that you (we) choose your favourite scientific method to start with anyway - I was referring to 'falsifiability' as regard by some as an essential requirement for an experiment to be scientifically valid, and as totally absurd by others, especially in the light of quantum theory, where the same conditions are likely never to be repeatable in an experiment. I am interested opinions on falsifiability btw -
- 'what about if the latter predictions are not identical because the conditions of the experiments are not identical when repeated, the chances of which are very likely when you consider reality in its subatomic complexity? Each scientist loves her favorite thats exactly and solely what I meant with my statement Eventually, someone comes up with a story yes, and someone comes up with a story and matsh that disagrees with the expertimental evidence, haven't you noticed?
we got all the time in the world (.mid) regarding the maths, well, as I learn on this list (thanks ) it is only a formalism to express the logic - so its ' quantum logic' that is exciting and challenging to me cheers PDM
-- Paola Di Maio School of IT www.mfu.ac.th *********************************************
LouisArmstrong(WeHaveAllTheTimeInTheWorld).mid _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), Kathryn Blackmond Laskey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is this a question?), John F. Sowa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |