[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] brainwaves (WAS: to concept or not to concept, is th

To: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Bill Andersen <andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:57:01 -0500
Message-id: <687C72F6-0C4C-4B9F-8CFA-0B73E3F83D4F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Pat    (01)

On Dec 17, 2007, at 22:53 , Pat Hayes wrote:    (02)

> Well, that's a pretty contrived axiom, seems to me. If you really  
> wanted to say this for some reason, then presumably we could make up  
> a name for it, say (notPartOfEmpireStatePossession x), which is kind  
> of weird but is still better than Skolem3457 when looking at long  
> opaque listings.    (03)

I'm with you.  That's why I said I liked the principle on its face (It  
*wasn't* a criticism - I really like it).  I'm just trying to see what  
a general principle of application would look like.    (04)

Bill Andersen (andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Ontology Works, Inc. (www.ontologyworks.com)
3600 O'Donnell Street, Suite 600
Baltimore, MD 21224
Office: 410-675-1201
Cell: 443-858-6444    (05)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>