Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> This conversation is going on too long. There is little to be gained by
> citing decorative text at us that we wrote, in an attempt to refute our
> position. At most, you will get us to admit that we may have made a poor
> choice of words. The ISO spec is quite tightly written, and I think its
> meaning is abundantly clear.
> (01)
I've learned a lot here. Many thanks to you and Chris for the time
you've taken to help me better understand. What I get here on the
ontolog forum by exploring issues like this with experts like you and
Chris is an education money can't buy ! (02)
> Pat
> (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|