[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:31:30 -0800
Message-id: <200712261731.30628.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 16:30, Pat Hayes wrote:
> ...
> No. IKL is what you get when you take CL and add the ability to
> denote *propositions*. It turns out that this enables you to have the
> expressivity (in fact, in many case rather more) that modal and
> context logics provide, without sacrificing the 'name transparency'
> property of CL itself, that every occurrence of a name is treated the
> same as every other occurrence.  But IKL is not a context logic, and
> contexts do not affect the denotations of names in IKL.    (01)

I'm curious why you're not bringing up ICL in this (ahem) context?    (02)

> ...
> Pat    (03)

Randall Schulz    (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>