ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] ISO merged ontology effort "MCO"

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Azamat" <abdoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:09:15 +0300
Message-id: <012d01c9bf90$006b5600$a104810a@homepc>
OK. No more strong criticism, justified or provoked.
This thread went astray as the MCO.
There are much more engaging subjects and problems awaiting the community.    (01)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ryan Kohl" <kohl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] ISO merged ontology effort "MCO"    (02)


> Azamat seems to be right - an ad hominem argument would be of the form
> "Statement X is true/false because person Y said Z"
> Suggesting that somebody is a hypocrite or inconsistent has the form
> "Person X is Y"
> So the latter doesn't indeed seem to be ad hominem.  Rather, it has the
> form of a personal attack, or slander.
>
>> Mike,
>> I hate any ad hominem argument, in any forms. The point was: if somebody 
>> is
>> a scholar, not a politician, the actions must be consistent with his
>> thoughts.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Mike Bennett" <mbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 7:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] ISO merged ontology effort "MCO"
>>
>>
>>
>>> That's very ad hominem. I think I will follow up the idea of selectively
>>> marking messages from those who prefer to attack the motivation or
>>> person rather than the substance. If you have anything interesting to
>>> say in the future, I for one probably won't see it.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Azamat wrote:
>>>
>>>> The same person actively arguing against any possibility of standard
>>>> ontology at the same time pushing a US Army baked "semantic
>>>> foundations" as an ISO standard.
>>>> A case of double personality? "A person having two minds and when they
>>>> are in the next state or character they don't know about their
>>>> previous stage." Or just hypocrisy?
>>>>
>>>> O tempora o mores!
>>>>
>>>>     ----- Original Message -----
>>>>     *From:* Pat Hayes <mailto:phayes@xxxxxxx>
>>>>     *To:* edbark@xxxxxxxx <mailto:edbark@xxxxxxxx> ; [ontolog-forum]
>>>>     <mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>     *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 5:45 PM
>>>>     *Subject:* Re: [ontolog-forum] ISO merged ontology effort "MCO"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Ed Barkmeyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     Patrick Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>     FYI: Result of 'MCO' study on  a standard upper ontology:
>>>>>>     Proposal not adopted.
>>>>>>     The issue is still important, and I would suggest we continue
>>>>>>     this thread
>>>>>>     for a while.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Pat
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Doc No:   2N1854
>>>>>>     Replaces: --
>>>>>>     Doc Type: Summary of voting/Table of Replies
>>>>>>     Date:     2009-04-12
>>>>>>     Title:    Summary of Voting on 32N1833 Request for SC32/WG2
>>>>>>     study period
>>>>>>     on standardized concept systems and semantic descriptions for
>>>>>>     merged core
>>>>>>     ontology (MCO) as proposed in 32N1807 Due Date: -
>>>>>>     Pages:    3
>>>>>>     Source:   SC32 Secretariat
>>>>>>     Project:  1.32.02
>>>>>>     Status:   proposed SC32 resolution is not adopted due to
>>>>>>     insufficient
>>>>>>     number of  P-members voting (JTC1 Directives, 9.1.10)
>>>>>>     Action:   FYI
>>>>>>
>>>>>     Thanks, Pat.
>>>>>     Interestingly, the proposal was defeated by lack of quorum -- too
>>>>>     few
>>>>>     national bodies sent in their ballots.  That suggests that there 
>>>>> is
>>>>>     little interest in such a standard.  Another tempest in a teapot.
>>>>>
>>>>     Now this has died the death, I can with a clear conscience reveal
>>>>     that the initiative for this ISO merging of merged upper
>>>>     ontologies came from the US Army, in the person of Jim Schoening,
>>>>     who has been active in promoting "Upper" ontologies for some time
>>>>     now (including the granddaddy of them, SUMO).
>>>>
>>>>     The motivation, among US Government agencies, for seeking ISO
>>>>     certification, is not to establish a New World Order that all must
>>>>     obey, or indeed to impose upon anyone else in any way at all. It
>>>>     is simply that there is a broad Government mandate to use ISO
>>>>     standards where possible, so that anything that has achieved ISO
>>>>     standardization status is easier to get funded, easier to get
>>>>     supported and easier to "sell" to other agencies. ISO
>>>>     standardization, amazingly enough, is a potent aid towards
>>>>     achieving interoperability /within/ the US government, as well as
>>>>     outside it.
>>>>
>>>>     Pat Hayes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     -Ed
>>>>>
>>>>>     -- 
>>>>>     Edward J. Barkmeyer                        Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
>>>>>     <mailto:edbark@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>     National Institute of Standards & Technology
>>>>>     Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
>>>>>     100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263                Tel: +1 301-975-3528
>>>>>     Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263                FAX: +1 301-975-4694
>>>>>
>>>>>     "The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
>>>>>      and have not been reviewed by any Government authority."
>>>>>
>>>>>     _________________________________________________________________
>>>>>     Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>>>>>     Config Subscr:
>>>>>     http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>>>>>     Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>     Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>>>>>     Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>>>>>     To join: 
>>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>>>>>     To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>     IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494
>>>>     3973
>>>>     40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
>>>>     Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
>>>>     FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
>>>>     phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>     _________________________________________________________________
>>>>     Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>>>>     Config Subscr:
>>>>     http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>>>>     Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>     Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>>>>     Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>>>>     To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>>>>     To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>>>> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>>>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>>>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>>>> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>>>> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Mike Bennett
>>> Director
>>> Hypercube Ltd.
>>> 89 Worship Street
>>> London EC2A 2BF
>>> Tel: +44 (0) 20 7917 9522
>>> Mob: +44 (0) 7721 420 730
>>> www.hypercube.co.uk
>>> Registered in England and Wales No. 2461068
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>>> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>>> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>>> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     (03)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>