ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] semantics of the mKR language

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:10:15 -0700
Message-id: <0EE14AAB02BF4700B70D0ECD37A23726@rhm8200>
John
I have read both of your books,
and I have read your paper, which
you referred me to previously.    (01)

Dick 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] semantics of the mKR language    (02)


> Dick,
> 
> What you have been doing is not even up to the level that the
> linguists, logicians, philosophers, and computer scientists
> were developing and implementing in the 1970s and early '80s.
> See, for example, the work on Montague grammar, situation
> semantics, discourse representation structures, and related
> topics.  All of them went far beyond what you've been trying
> to do with your context fields -- and they did it 20 or 30
> years ago.
> 
> RHM>  I don't believe John or Pat have come to grips with the
> > meaning of symbols in any natural language, e.g., English.
> 
> I can assure you that Pat has been working and collaborating
> with people in those fields for a long time.  If you want to
> bring your work up to the level of the 1980s, I recommend my
> 1984 book, _Conceptual Structures_, which discusses and refers
> to those areas. You can find most of that material in my
> on-line bibliography:
> 
>    http://www.jfsowa.com/bib.htm
> 
> If you want to come up to the 1990s level, you can read my
> book _Knowledge Representation_ and many other recent
> publications that are also in that bibliography.  I also
> refer to a great deal of the historical and recent work
> in the paper _Pursuing the Goal of Language Understanding_:
> 
>    http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/pursuing.pdf
> 
> RHM> I have not tried to do more complex reasoning.  I have
> > devoted my efforts to exploring different applications to see
> > if mKR could adequately describe those applications.
> 
> Many the people we have been citing have developed systems
> and notations that describe those areas and reason about them.
> As I said before, you should *study* their work before
> reinventing a flat wheel.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>    (03)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>