John
I have read your http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/pursuing.pdf paper with
interest.
Questions:
1. Where is (/was/going to be) it published.
2. Would they/you accept a piece of criticism of your paper? (01)
Thanks
Frank (02)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John F. Sowa
> Sent: 26 March 2009 05:54
> To: [ontolog-forum]
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] semantics of the mKR language
>
> Dick,
>
> What you have been doing is not even up to the level that the
> linguists, logicians, philosophers, and computer scientists
> were developing and implementing in the 1970s and early '80s.
> See, for example, the work on Montague grammar, situation
> semantics, discourse representation structures, and related
> topics. All of them went far beyond what you've been trying
> to do with your context fields -- and they did it 20 or 30
> years ago.
>
> RHM> I don't believe John or Pat have come to grips with the
> > meaning of symbols in any natural language, e.g., English.
>
> I can assure you that Pat has been working and collaborating
> with people in those fields for a long time. If you want to
> bring your work up to the level of the 1980s, I recommend my
> 1984 book, _Conceptual Structures_, which discusses and refers
> to those areas. You can find most of that material in my
> on-line bibliography:
>
> http://www.jfsowa.com/bib.htm
>
> If you want to come up to the 1990s level, you can read my
> book _Knowledge Representation_ and many other recent
> publications that are also in that bibliography. I also
> refer to a great deal of the historical and recent work
> in the paper _Pursuing the Goal of Language Understanding_:
>
> http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/pursuing.pdf
>
> RHM> I have not tried to do more complex reasoning. I have
> > devoted my efforts to exploring different applications to see
> > if mKR could adequately describe those applications.
>
> Many the people we have been citing have developed systems
> and notations that describe those areas and reason about them.
> As I said before, you should *study* their work before
> reinventing a flat wheel.
>
> John
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.28/2022 - Release Date: 03/25/09
> 07:16:00 (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|