Re: [ontolog-forum] RDF vs. EAR

[Duane Nickull <duane@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Can't we now accept that RDF/XML isn't the overarching definition of RDF?  It does have a model distinct from a variety of syntaxes and data serialization formats. 

DN: Yes.  That is exactly how I understand the specifications when I read them.  The abstract model encapsulates all the semantics and logic.  RDF/XML is a non-exclusive _expression_ of RDF allowing for other expressions.

Duane

---

Überity.com

Principal Data Architect &

Adobe LiveCycle ES Consultant Services 

http://www.uberity.com

Blog | http://technoracle.blogspot.com

Twitter | @duanechaos

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:02:21 -0500
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] RDF vs. EAR

Can't we now accept that RDF/XML isn't the overarching definition of RDF?  It does have a model distinct from a variety of syntaxes and data serialization formats. 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)