ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] RDF vs. EAR

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Matthew West" <dr.matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:20:27 -0000
Message-id: <4ee0815b.10cfe30a.4e1c.ffffc457@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Colleagues,    (01)

Kingsley raises an important point.    (02)

> RDF/XML imploded a long time ago, it didn't need anything to do that.
> Masking the simplicity of the triple was always its fundamental
shortcoming
> re. comprehension and adoption. It's influence ended at the dawn of the
Linked
> Open Data era. It's been been an option every since.
> 
> Naturally, the W3C left it hanging around as the default standard for way
too
> long. That said, these days everyone knows its nothing more than an
optional
> relic.
> 
> You may find that you are the only one that still brings RDF/XML into
> conversations these days with regards to Linked Data and/or the Semantic
Web
> Project :-)    (03)

I am on the Policy and Planning Committee for ISO TC184/SC4 amongst other
things, and in that role I get to review many proposed standards that
potentially impact our work. The approach I take in giving my
recommendations is one of triage. You can divide standards into three:    (04)

1. Those that are well conceived and fulfil a well defined need.
I recommend we support them and use them.    (05)

2. Those that are misconceived and are unlikely to be useful.
I recommend that we state our concerns to the developers and that thereafter
we ignore them. In particular we do not criticise them in public, that gives
them publicity, we want them to die quietly.    (06)

3. Those that are nearly good, and are relevant to our field.
I groan when I see one of these, because it means we ought to try to get it
into the first category, and that will require work and commitment by us.
The initial steps are to see if we have someone who is prepared to
contribute and contact the community developing the standard and see how
open they are to the contribution we could make. No point bashing your head
against a brick wall.    (07)

Bottom Line
Don't talk about the standards you don't like, you give them oxygen just by
doing it. If they are not useful they will not be used, let them die
quietly.    (08)

Regards    (09)

Matthew West                            
Information  Junction
Tel: +44 1489 880185
Mobile: +44 750 3385279
Skype: dr.matthew.west
matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/    (010)

This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England
and Wales No. 6632177.
Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.    (011)




_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (012)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>