To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Ali Hashemi <ali.hashemi+ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:58:36 -0500 |
Message-id: | <5ab1dc970901270958r2f14ad6by1f1599a4d08cc0c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Not sure how much extra work this would create, But there is a third option of having a sub-forum where things are vetted. For example, right now we send to "ontolog-forum@..." we could have an additional "ontolog-forum+vetted@..." where messages to the latter are indeed vetted. If people find the general threads too much to wade through, they could set up a client side filter. Alternatively, extending John's idea, messages could also be simply tagged after the fact (tho one would have to visit the forums @ ontolog for this type of filtering). As it stands, there does seem to be a lot of "noise" that one has to wade through to get to interesting signals :P. My three cents, Ali On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Azamat <abdoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I can believe reading this. -- (•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,., _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Tighter control of ontolog forum?, Todd Schneider |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontolog-forum] What is an Ontology [was - Re: Is there something I missed?], Peter Yim |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Tighter control of ontolog forum?, Azamat |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Tighter control of ontolog forum?, David C. Hay |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |