My understanding is that we are planning to have a number of collateral
and documents, including Ontology Application Framework, Case Studies,
Use-Cases, Value Metrics and Models, so adding a user-reconfigurable
slide deck only makes sense. (01)
On 3/22/11 6:51 AM, Todd Schneider wrote:
>> It occurred to me that our target audience (business people who can make
>> decisions) may be more likely to see a Powerpoint pitch than wade
>> through 4-6 pages of text.
>> Which would YOU be more inclined to look at?
>> What are your thoughts?
>> For me, I personally prefer to read a good paper for a topic that
>> interests me. Nevertheless, it takes less than a minute to scan through
>> a slide deck and get enough of the gist to decide to read more
>> carefully. If people wrote excellent abstracts, I could do the same for
>> a text document, but you can never trust that they will.
> --->>>You have an excellent point. However, I assume the summit participants
> would actually like to communicate. What I would suggest is do both.
> Having created the communique, PowerPoint slides could then be
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670 (04)
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (05)