Re: [ontolog-forum] glossary of ontology terminology

[Bill Andersen <andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Folks,

Didn't we just all go through a grueling 4-month exercise wherein it was explicitly decided that nobody was going to try to decide what the term "ontology" meant.  Is there reason to believe this exercise, insofar as it departs from including terms from such well-charted territory as logic, will be any more successful?

.bill

On Jun 18, 2007, at 06:37 , dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Paola,

I think starting a glossary of ontology terminology is an excellent idea.  I think, though, that there should be an editorial and peer review process in place to manage the quality of content and to facilitate resolution of variations.  And, that these processes should reflect the views and experiences of the larger community.

Best regards,
Denise

-----ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx
Sent by: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 06/17/2007 09:27AM
Subject: [ontolog-forum] glossary of ontology terminology


Peoples, 

I am looking for a credible glossary of ontological terms, and I dont find anything easily accessible, comprehensive and uptodate that I can trust

Bill Andersen (andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

Chief Scientist

Ontology Works, Inc. (www.ontologyworks.com)

3600 O'Donnell Street, Suite 600

Baltimore, MD 21224

Office: 410-675-1201

Cell: 443-858-6444

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)