|Date:||Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:55:43 +0700|
Yes of course we need a review process, but given the wealth of knowledgeable sources on this list I am sure we should be able to elicit some positive inputs to get us started
In case there is no consensus on any given definition, we can always have more instances,
Peter, is there a formal way of setting up this initiative with this group?
I am starting a similar process/procedure with the w3 incubator group regarding he emergency management ontology with a similar goal..
Or shall I just start with pening a page and ask people to help refine the definitions in a civilized and open way using standard wiki culture? Ideally, we would make the glossary 'exportable' so that it can be pulled by other websites
Comments? (do people think this is an impossible task for some reason)
On 6/18/07, dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] glossary of ontology terminology, dbedford|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] is CycL decidable?, Bill Andersen|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] glossary of ontology terminology, dbedford|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] glossary of ontology terminology, Peter Yim|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|