[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Re: OWL and lack of identifiers

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:04:34 -0400
Message-id: <p06110419c25a9c0f517c@[]>
>[PFB] I would argue whether the examples you cite are evidence
>  > of artificial intelligence or just well-designed transactional
>  > systems.
>[JS]The boundary of AI is not well defined.    (01)

[KBL]    (02)

I have heard it said, not entirely tongue in cheek, that the 
definition of artificial intelligence is that which computers cannot 
yet do.  The moment we succeed at automating a capability, many will 
no longer consider it AI.  Therefore, by definition, the field of AI 
is doomed to failure.    (03)

K    (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>