Based on the responses received, we are NOT going to have this call
tomorrow -- i.e. time slot (a): Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time. (01)
Let's aim at doing it at time slot (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm
California time. Assume approx 1.5~2.0 hours for the call. I'd still
need responses from those who will be joining us (at this time slot.)
I'll re-confirm once I've received enough responses. (02)
Thanks. -ppy
-- (03)
Peter Yim wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:24:47 -0800: (04)
> Thank you, Pat, Sue and Tim for the quick response.
>
> Tim helped narrow it down to two immediate option. I'd personally prefer
> (a), but then (because of the immediacy) we would need to determine very
> quickly on whether or not that is viable. If we can't make (a), I'd
> still hope we do it on (d).
>
> >> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
> >> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
> >>
>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>
> >>
> >> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
> >>
>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>
>
>
> It would be wonderful if we can hear from Adam, Kurt, Bill, Monica,
> Cecelia, Bo, Leo, (I would have included Monica and Bob too, but I know
> they are both out of the country) and anyone else who plan to
> participate, if you could make it to (a), if we do it then; and, would
> time slot (d) be ok with you.
>
> URGENT: I'd need to hear back within the next 7 hours (from the time of
> this message), and if (a) is viable, I'll make the conference call
> reservations, and inform everyone within an hour of that closing time.
>
> Thanks. -ppy
> --
>
>
> Tim McGrath wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:33:05 +0800:
>
>> not surprisingly i prefer option (d) - next friday morning to me. but
>> option (a) is OK if that is too far away.
>
> ---
>
>
> Sue Probert wrote Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:08:06 -0000:
> > Hi Peter
> >
> > I am sorry but I cannot make any calls until mid March at the very
> > earliest due to meeting commitments etc.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Sue
> ---
>
>
> Patrick Cassidy wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:06:59 -0500:
>
> > Peter --
> > I can participate in any of those time slots.
> >
> > Pat
> > ----------------
>
>
>> Peter Yim wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:22:59 -0800:
>>
>>> Sue & Tim,
>>>
>>> Further to our discussion at the ubl-lcsc call this morning and
>>> earlier exchanges on the forum (ref.
>>>
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=%2Bsubject%3Amodeling+core+component+types&submit=Search%21&idxname=ontolog-forum&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Alate),
>
>>> I'd liked to schedule a conference call where either or both of you
>>> (in the same or a different session) bring those of us working on the
>>> ubl-ontology project, up to speed by providing context, status and
>>> semantics for Core Component Types -- as a necessary step towards our
>>> developing an ontology on the CCT's other CC's and eventually UBL.
>>>
>>> Our first preference, in terms of timing, would be during our regular
>>> Thursday [ontolog] conference calls which starts 10:30am California
>>> time. (Tim did, and rightfully so, indicated that this is obviously
>>> not a good time for someone in West Australia, because that is 2:30am
>>> there.)
>>>
>>> This is important enough that I, for one, am open to all options. I
>>> would hope to see this happen sooner, rather than later.
>>>
>>> Therefore, to get the ball rolling, let me start by suggesting a few
>>> time slots. Then will each of you, Sue and Tim, as well as interested
>>> members of the ubl-ontology team and the ontolog community, come back
>>> and indicate, which (hopefully all) of those slots would work for
>>> you. If none would, please give us 2 or 3 slots in return, so that we
>>> can start over. Here goes (although given our geographic
>>> distribution, there is really no "ideal" time):
>>>
>>> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
>>> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>> (b) Thu 11-Mar-2004 2:00pm California time
>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>> (c) Thu 11-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time
>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is important to our ubl-ontology work. Ontolog participants,
>>> please make your best attempt to participate, and please so indicate,
>>> in order that we can make our best effort to accomodate everyone.
>>>
>>> Thanks & regards. -ppy
>>> --
>>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post:
> mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|