ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ontolog-forum] Re: Conference Call on modeling/formalizing represe

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Yunker, John" <yunker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:53:30 -0800
Message-id: <291BE32C6745A048BF5629A277BA0DFCE1E9AE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hey Peter, sorry for being a no-show of late - too many fires.    (01)

I think I will be able to make time slot (d).    (02)

John    (03)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Yim
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 1:53 PM
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Re: Conference Call on modeling/formalizing 
representation of Core Component Types    (04)


Based on the responses received, we are NOT going to have this call 
tomorrow -- i.e. time slot (a): Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time.    (05)

Let's aim at doing it at time slot (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm 
California time. Assume approx 1.5~2.0 hours for the call. I'd still 
need responses from those who will be joining us (at this time slot.) 
I'll re-confirm once I've received enough responses.    (06)

Thanks.  -ppy
--    (07)

Peter Yim wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:24:47 -0800:    (08)

> Thank you, Pat, Sue and Tim for the quick response.
> 
> Tim helped narrow it down to two immediate option. I'd personally 
> prefer
> (a), but then (because of the immediacy) we would need to determine very 
> quickly on whether or not that is viable. If we can't make (a), I'd 
> still hope we do it on (d).
> 
>  >> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm 
> in  >> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)  >>
> 
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
> 
> 
>  >>
>  >> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
>  >>
> 
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
> 
> 
> 
> 
> It would be wonderful if we can hear from Adam, Kurt, Bill, Monica,
> Cecelia, Bo, Leo, (I would have included Monica and Bob too, but I know 
> they are both out of the country) and anyone else who plan to 
> participate, if you could make it to (a), if we do it then; and, would 
> time slot (d) be ok with you.
> 
> URGENT: I'd need to hear back within the next 7 hours (from the time 
> of
> this message), and if (a) is viable, I'll make the conference call 
> reservations, and inform everyone within an hour of that closing time.
> 
> Thanks.  -ppy
> --
> 
> 
> Tim McGrath wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:33:05 +0800:
> 
>> not surprisingly i prefer option (d) - next friday morning to me.  
>> but
>> option (a) is OK if that is too far away.
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> Sue Probert wrote Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:08:06 -0000:
>  > Hi Peter
>  >
>  > I am sorry but I cannot make any calls until mid March at the very  
> > earliest due to meeting commitments etc.  >
>  > regards
>  >
>  > Sue
> ---
> 
> 
> Patrick Cassidy wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:06:59 -0500:
> 
>  > Peter --
>  >   I can participate in any of those time slots.
>  >
>  >    Pat
>  > ----------------
> 
> 
>> Peter Yim wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:22:59 -0800:
>>
>>> Sue & Tim,
>>>
>>> Further to our discussion at the ubl-lcsc call this morning and
>>> earlier exchanges on the forum (ref. 
>>> 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=%2Bsubject%3Amodeling+core+component+types&submit=Search%21&idxname=ontolog-forum&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Alate),
> 
>>> I'd liked to schedule a conference call where either or both of you 
>>> (in the same or a different session) bring those of us working on the 
>>> ubl-ontology project, up to speed by providing context, status and 
>>> semantics for Core Component Types -- as a necessary step towards our 
>>> developing an ontology on the CCT's  other CC's and eventually UBL.
>>>
>>> Our first preference, in terms of timing, would be during our 
>>> regular
>>> Thursday [ontolog] conference calls which starts 10:30am California 
>>> time. (Tim did, and rightfully so, indicated that this is obviously 
>>> not a good time for someone in West Australia, because that is 2:30am 
>>> there.)
>>>
>>> This is important enough that I, for one, am open to all options. I
>>> would hope to see this happen sooner, rather than later.
>>>
>>> Therefore, to get the ball rolling, let me start by suggesting a few
>>> time slots. Then will each of you, Sue and Tim, as well as interested 
>>> members of the ubl-ontology team and the ontolog community, come back 
>>> and indicate, which (hopefully all) of those slots would work for 
>>> you. If none would, please give us 2 or 3 slots in return, so that we 
>>> can start over. Here goes (although given our geographic 
>>> distribution, there is really no "ideal" time):
>>>
>>> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
>>> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
>>> 
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
> 
>>>
>>>
>>> (b) Thu 11-Mar-2004 2:00pm California time 
>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&;
>>> year=2004&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>>>
>>>
>>> (c) Thu 11-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time 
>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&;
>>> year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>>>
>>>
>>> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time 
>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&;
>>> year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>>>
>>>
>>> This is important to our ubl-ontology work. Ontolog participants,
>>> please make your best attempt to participate, and please so indicate, 
>>> in order that we can make our best effort to accomodate everyone.
>>>
>>> Thanks & regards.  -ppy
>>> --
>>>
>>
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: 
> mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>     (09)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (010)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (011)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [ontolog-forum] Re: Conference Call on modeling/formalizing representation of Core Component Types, Yunker, John <=