Thank you, Pat, Sue and Tim for the quick response. (01)
Tim helped narrow it down to two immediate option. I'd personally
prefer (a), but then (because of the immediacy) we would need to
determine very quickly on whether or not that is viable. If we can't
make (a), I'd still hope we do it on (d). (02)
>> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
>> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
>>
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224 (03)
>>
>> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
>>
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224 (04)
It would be wonderful if we can hear from Adam, Kurt, Bill, Monica,
Cecelia, Bo, Leo, (I would have included Monica and Bob too, but I
know they are both out of the country) and anyone else who plan to
participate, if you could make it to (a), if we do it then; and, would
time slot (d) be ok with you. (05)
URGENT: I'd need to hear back within the next 7 hours (from the time
of this message), and if (a) is viable, I'll make the conference call
reservations, and inform everyone within an hour of that closing time. (06)
Thanks. -ppy
-- (07)
Tim McGrath wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:33:05 +0800: (08)
> not surprisingly i prefer option (d) - next friday morning to me. but
> option (a) is OK if that is too far away.
--- (09)
Sue Probert wrote Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:08:06 -0000:
> Hi Peter
>
> I am sorry but I cannot make any calls until mid March at the very
> earliest due to meeting commitments etc.
>
> regards
>
> Sue
--- (010)
Patrick Cassidy wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:06:59 -0500: (011)
> Peter --
> I can participate in any of those time slots.
>
> Pat
> ---------------- (012)
> Peter Yim wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:22:59 -0800:
>
>> Sue & Tim,
>>
>> Further to our discussion at the ubl-lcsc call this morning and
>> earlier exchanges on the forum (ref.
>>
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=%2Bsubject%3Amodeling+core+component+types&submit=Search%21&idxname=ontolog-forum&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Alate),
>
>> I'd liked to schedule a conference call where either or both of you
>> (in the same or a different session) bring those of us working on the
>> ubl-ontology project, up to speed by providing context, status and
>> semantics for Core Component Types -- as a necessary step towards our
>> developing an ontology on the CCT's other CC's and eventually UBL.
>>
>> Our first preference, in terms of timing, would be during our regular
>> Thursday [ontolog] conference calls which starts 10:30am California
>> time. (Tim did, and rightfully so, indicated that this is obviously
>> not a good time for someone in West Australia, because that is 2:30am
>> there.)
>>
>> This is important enough that I, for one, am open to all options. I
>> would hope to see this happen sooner, rather than later.
>>
>> Therefore, to get the ball rolling, let me start by suggesting a few
>> time slots. Then will each of you, Sue and Tim, as well as interested
>> members of the ubl-ontology team and the ontolog community, come back
>> and indicate, which (hopefully all) of those slots would work for you.
>> If none would, please give us 2 or 3 slots in return, so that we can
>> start over. Here goes (although given our geographic distribution,
>> there is really no "ideal" time):
>>
>> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
>> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>
>>
>> (b) Thu 11-Mar-2004 2:00pm California time
>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>
>>
>> (c) Thu 11-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time
>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>
>>
>> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>
>>
>> This is important to our ubl-ontology work. Ontolog participants,
>> please make your best attempt to participate, and please so indicate,
>> in order that we can make our best effort to accomodate everyone.
>>
>> Thanks & regards. -ppy
>> --
>>
> (013)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (014)
|