[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-forum] RE: Conference Call on modeling/formalizing representat

To: "Peter Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>, "Tim McGrath" <tmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jon Bosak <jon.bosak@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Sue Probert" <sue.probert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:08:06 -0000
Message-id: <IKECLKJIBBLACCHIHLFMAEJPCIAA.sue.probert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Peter    (01)

I am sorry but I cannot make any calls until mid March at the very earliest
due to meeting commitments etc.    (02)

regards    (03)

Sue    (04)

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: 02 March 2004 19:23
To: Sue Probert; Tim McGrath
Cc: CRAWFORD, Mark; [ontolog-forum]; Jon Bosak
Subject: Conference Call on modeling/formalizing representation of Core
Component Types    (05)

Sue & Tim,    (06)

Further to our discussion at the ubl-lcsc call this morning and
earlier exchanges on the forum (ref.
I'd liked to schedule a conference call where either or both of you
(in the same or a different session) bring those of us working on the
ubl-ontology project, up to speed by providing context, status and
semantics for Core Component Types -- as a necessary step towards our
developing an ontology on the CCT's  other CC's and eventually UBL.    (07)

Our first preference, in terms of timing, would be during our regular
Thursday [ontolog] conference calls which starts 10:30am California
time. (Tim did, and rightfully so, indicated that this is obviously
not a good time for someone in West Australia, because that is 2:30am
there.)    (08)

This is important enough that I, for one, am open to all options. I
would hope to see this happen sooner, rather than later.    (09)

Therefore, to get the ball rolling, let me start by suggesting a few
time slots. Then will each of you, Sue and Tim, as well as interested
members of the ubl-ontology team and the ontolog community, come back
and indicate, which (hopefully all) of those slots would work for you.
If none would, please give us 2 or 3 slots in return, so that we can
start over. Here goes (although given our geographic distribution,
there is really no "ideal" time):    (010)

(a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224    (011)

(b) Thu 11-Mar-2004 2:00pm California time
4&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=224    (012)

(c) Thu 11-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time
4&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224    (013)

(d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
4&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224    (014)

This is important to our ubl-ontology work. Ontolog participants,
please make your best attempt to participate, and please so indicate,
in order that we can make our best effort to accomodate everyone.    (015)

Thanks & regards.  -ppy
--    (016)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (017)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>