[Top] [All Lists]

ERRATA [was - Re: [ontolog-forum] Re: Conference Call on modeling/forma

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:34:31 -0800
Message-id: <404F3587.3020900@xxxxxxxx>
ERRATA,    (01)

Pat's post (excerpt below) has been misplaced on this thread.    (02)

To make sure we are not causing undue confusion, please note that we 
are having two (2) different conference calls on 2004.03.11,    (03)

(a) the one held during our regular weekly conference call time slot 
(starting at Wed 2004.03.11 10:30am California Time), is the invited 
presentation by Dr. Patrick Cassidy. Please refer to the following 
wiki page for details: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_03_11    (04)

(b) the other, is a special conference call aimed at discussing issues 
relating to modeling and formalizing representation of Core Component 
Types. That is going to be held 5.5 hours after the above presentation 
  (starting at Wed 2004.03.11 4:00pm California Time). Please refer to 
the following wiki page for details: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_03_11_CCT    (05)

I look forward to seeing you there. Please sign up at the respective 
wiki pages (or email me offline) if you plan to attend.    (06)

Regards.  -ppy
--    (07)

Patrick Cassidy wrote Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:32:52 -0500:    (08)

>   My plan for the presentation is summarized below, and on the
> Wiki site:
> Peter Yim wrote:
>> The subject is now confirmed.
>> Time of call is: slot (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time. 
>> Assume approx 1.5~2.0 hours. 
>>  >
>>     *
>     The talk on March 11 will focus on how concepts represented in SKIF, 
> ...[snip]...
>    I will appreciate any comments on the manner in which I have chosen 
> to represent these business concepts, especially since my own 
> interpretation of the short descriptions of the meanings may very well 
> miss the intended meanings. This should be a good opportunity to discuss 
> concrete substantive issues in the representation of business concepts, 
> and I hope you all will be able to attend.  These representations are 
> only suggestions, and I expect that some or perhaps most of them will 
> change as a result of comments from people knowledgeable in the domain 
> business transactions, or from suggestions about ways to represent and 
> visualize such concepts.
>    Pat
> =============================================    (09)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (010)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>