Peter, (01)
Regrettably work commitments are going to make it very difficult for me to
make any of the calls for the next few months. (02)
- Bo Newman - (03)
At 06:24 AM 03/03/2004 -0800, Peter Yim wrote:
>Thank you, Pat, Sue and Tim for the quick response.
>
>Tim helped narrow it down to two immediate option. I'd personally prefer
>(a), but then (because of the immediacy) we would need to determine very
>quickly on whether or not that is viable. If we can't make (a), I'd still
>hope we do it on (d).
>
> >> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
> >> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
> >>
>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>
> >>
> >> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
> >>
>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>
>
>
>It would be wonderful if we can hear from Adam, Kurt, Bill, Monica,
>Cecelia, Bo, Leo, (I would have included Monica and Bob too, but I know
>they are both out of the country) and anyone else who plan to participate,
>if you could make it to (a), if we do it then; and, would time slot (d) be
>ok with you.
>
>URGENT: I'd need to hear back within the next 7 hours (from the time of
>this message), and if (a) is viable, I'll make the conference call
>reservations, and inform everyone within an hour of that closing time.
>
>Thanks. -ppy
>--
>
>
>Tim McGrath wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:33:05 +0800:
>
>>not surprisingly i prefer option (d) - next friday morning to me. but
>>option (a) is OK if that is too far away.
>---
>
>
>Sue Probert wrote Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:08:06 -0000:
> > Hi Peter
> >
> > I am sorry but I cannot make any calls until mid March at the very
> > earliest due to meeting commitments etc.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Sue
>---
>
>
>Patrick Cassidy wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:06:59 -0500:
>
> > Peter --
> > I can participate in any of those time slots.
> >
> > Pat
> > ----------------
>
>
>>Peter Yim wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:22:59 -0800:
>>
>>>Sue & Tim,
>>>
>>>Further to our discussion at the ubl-lcsc call this morning and earlier
>>>exchanges on the forum (ref.
>>>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=%2Bsubject%3Amodeling+core+component+types&submit=Search%21&idxname=ontolog-forum&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Alate),
>
>>>I'd liked to schedule a conference call where either or both of you (in
>>>the same or a different session) bring those of us working on the
>>>ubl-ontology project, up to speed by providing context, status and
>>>semantics for Core Component Types -- as a necessary step towards our
>>>developing an ontology on the CCT's other CC's and eventually UBL.
>>>
>>>Our first preference, in terms of timing, would be during our regular
>>>Thursday [ontolog] conference calls which starts 10:30am California
>>>time. (Tim did, and rightfully so, indicated that this is obviously not
>>>a good time for someone in West Australia, because that is 2:30am there.)
>>>
>>>This is important enough that I, for one, am open to all options. I
>>>would hope to see this happen sooner, rather than later.
>>>
>>>Therefore, to get the ball rolling, let me start by suggesting a few
>>>time slots. Then will each of you, Sue and Tim, as well as interested
>>>members of the ubl-ontology team and the ontolog community, come back
>>>and indicate, which (hopefully all) of those slots would work for you.
>>>If none would, please give us 2 or 3 slots in return, so that we can
>>>start over. Here goes (although given our geographic distribution, there
>>>is really no "ideal" time):
>>>
>>>(a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
>>>London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>>(b) Thu 11-Mar-2004 2:00pm California time
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>>(c) Thu 11-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>>(d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>
>>>
>>>This is important to our ubl-ontology work. Ontolog participants, please
>>>make your best attempt to participate, and please so indicate, in order
>>>that we can make our best effort to accomodate everyone.
>>>
>>>Thanks & regards. -ppy
>>>--
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post:
>mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|