The subject is now confirmed. (01)
Time of call is: slot (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time.
Assume approx 1.5~2.0 hours.
<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224 (02)
> (03)
Please refer to the following wiki page to get ready for the call (the
same page will be used during the call too):
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_03_11_CCT (04)
RSVP if you have not already done so. (05)
Regards. -ppy
-- (06)
Peter Yim wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:52:57 -0800: (07)
> Based on the responses received, we are NOT going to have this call
> tomorrow -- i.e. time slot (a): Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time.
>
> Let's aim at doing it at time slot (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California
> time. Assume approx 1.5~2.0 hours for the call. I'd still need responses
> from those who will be joining us (at this time slot.) I'll re-confirm
> once I've received enough responses.
>
> Thanks. -ppy
> --
>
> Peter Yim wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:24:47 -0800:
>
>> Thank you, Pat, Sue and Tim for the quick response.
>>
>> Tim helped narrow it down to two immediate option. I'd personally
>> prefer (a), but then (because of the immediacy) we would need to
>> determine very quickly on whether or not that is viable. If we can't
>> make (a), I'd still hope we do it on (d).
>>
>> >> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
>> >> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
>> >>
>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>
>> >>
>> >> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
>> >>
>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be wonderful if we can hear from Adam, Kurt, Bill, Monica,
>> Cecelia, Bo, Leo, (I would have included Monica and Bob too, but I
>> know they are both out of the country) and anyone else who plan to
>> participate, if you could make it to (a), if we do it then; and, would
>> time slot (d) be ok with you.
>>
>> URGENT: I'd need to hear back within the next 7 hours (from the time
>> of this message), and if (a) is viable, I'll make the conference call
>> reservations, and inform everyone within an hour of that closing time.
>>
>> Thanks. -ppy
>> --
>>
>>
>> Tim McGrath wrote Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:33:05 +0800:
>>
>>> not surprisingly i prefer option (d) - next friday morning to me.
>>> but option (a) is OK if that is too far away.
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Sue Probert wrote Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:08:06 -0000:
>> > Hi Peter
>> >
>> > I am sorry but I cannot make any calls until mid March at the very
>> > earliest due to meeting commitments etc.
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > Sue
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Patrick Cassidy wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:06:59 -0500:
>>
>> > Peter --
>> > I can participate in any of those time slots.
>> >
>> > Pat
>> > ----------------
>>
>>
>>> Peter Yim wrote Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:22:59 -0800:
>>>
>>>> Sue & Tim,
>>>>
>>>> Further to our discussion at the ubl-lcsc call this morning and
>>>> earlier exchanges on the forum (ref.
>>>>
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=%2Bsubject%3Amodeling+core+component+types&submit=Search%21&idxname=ontolog-forum&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Alate),
>
>>>> I'd liked to schedule a conference call where either or both of you
>>>> (in the same or a different session) bring those of us working on
>>>> the ubl-ontology project, up to speed by providing context, status
>>>> and semantics for Core Component Types -- as a necessary step
>>>> towards our developing an ontology on the CCT's other CC's and
>>>> eventually UBL.
>>>>
>>>> Our first preference, in terms of timing, would be during our
>>>> regular Thursday [ontolog] conference calls which starts 10:30am
>>>> California time. (Tim did, and rightfully so, indicated that this is
>>>> obviously not a good time for someone in West Australia, because
>>>> that is 2:30am there.)
>>>>
>>>> This is important enough that I, for one, am open to all options. I
>>>> would hope to see this happen sooner, rather than later.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, to get the ball rolling, let me start by suggesting a few
>>>> time slots. Then will each of you, Sue and Tim, as well as
>>>> interested members of the ubl-ontology team and the ontolog
>>>> community, come back and indicate, which (hopefully all) of those
>>>> slots would work for you. If none would, please give us 2 or 3 slots
>>>> in return, so that we can start over. Here goes (although given our
>>>> geographic distribution, there is really no "ideal" time):
>>>>
>>>> (a) Thu 04-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time (which would be 11 pm in
>>>> London; 7 am in West Australia, and 6 pm in New Jersey)
>>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=4&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (b) Thu 11-Mar-2004 2:00pm California time
>>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (c) Thu 11-Mar-2004 3:00pm California time
>>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (d) Thu 11-Mar-2004 4:00pm California time
>>>>
>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=11&month=3&year=2004&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=224
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is important to our ubl-ontology work. Ontolog participants,
>>>> please make your best attempt to participate, and please so
>>>> indicate, in order that we can make our best effort to accomodate
>>>> everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & regards. -ppy
>>>> -- (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (09)
|