Brand if your objective is to prove you are a brat you have succeeded. Either
post the attribution or remove the content. (01)
Sent from my iPhone (02)
On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote: (03)
> Brand,
>
> As I mentioned in my last response, whatever you say to Jerry is
> irrelevant to the case at hand. Please take that off this mailing
> list.
>
> Brand Niemann, would you stop creating distractions and do what you
> need to do, and let me repeat that again: STOP YOUR INFRINGEMENT OF
> OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES RIGHTS !
>
> =ppy
> --
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Brand Niemann <bniemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jerry, Since you and Peter want to persist in this, I say: Stop it and
>> Apologize.
>>
>>
>>
>> I also say: Write down what you heard me say in that DoD meeting (where I
>> was ask to present) what you heard me say before, during, and after the
>> meeting, and we can ask the four other people in attendance what they heard.
>>
>>
>>
>> The purpose of the email was to say there were witnesses to what I said in
>> response to you and they were satisfied with my answers.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards, Brand
>
>
>> From: jerrylsmit@xxxxxxx [mailto:jerrylsmit@xxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 9:41 PM
>> To: bniemann@xxxxxxx; peter.yim@xxxxxxxx
>> Cc: ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Summit Website
>>
>>
>>
>> Brand,
>>
>> I don't recall any such words at all.
>>
>> Kindly explain what you are trying to do with an email such as this.
>>
>> Your statement is untrue.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brand Niemann <bniemann@xxxxxxx>
>> To: 'Peter Yim' <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>; jerrylsmit <jerrylsmit@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: 'Ontology Summit 2012 discussion' <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 4:36 pm
>> Subject: RE: [ontology-summit] Summit Website
>>
>> Peter, I just spoke with Jerry Smith in a DoD meeting we were both in and
>>
>> told him that I am informed that because this was a government-sponsored and
>>
>> -hosted event your content claims do not have merit and interfere with my
>>
>> work, so I would ask for an apology. Best regards, Brand
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter
>>
>> Yim
>>
>> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:09 PM
>>
>> To: Brand Niemann
>>
>> Cc: Ontology Summit 2012 discussion
>>
>> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Summit Website
>>
>>
>>
>> Brand,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Leo Obrst, our Ontology Summit general chair has already notified you, on
>>
>> 15-Apr-2012, ref.
>>
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/2012-04/msg00081.html
>>
>> that,
>>
>> //
>>
>> Until you have made proper attribution to our work, and clearly state on
>>
>> your website that your work is also openly shared under OPL v1.0 or (cc
>>
>> by-sa 3.0), please remove our Summit content from your website.
>>
>> //
>>
>> [ while the summit content on the OntologWiki is licensed under OPL
>>
>> v1.0 or (cc by-sa 3.0), work from the OntologySummit2012 website is
>>
>> specifically license under (cc by-sa 3.0) ]
>>
>>
>>
>> To date, you have not been responsive to that request yet, nor have you
>>
>> taken down the content from your MindTouch : Semanticommunity.info
>>
>> : AOL Government site.
>>
>>
>>
>> I can still see our OntologySummit2012 website content, copied word-for-word
>>
>> on your site, but have yet to see proper attribution, and the site license
>>
>> from MindTouch, and/or Semanticommunity.info and/or AOL Government stating
>>
>> that they operates under the (cc by-sa
>>
>> 3.0) open content license.
>>
>>
>>
>> I personally think that this is very unprofessional of you to use our
>>
>> material and disregard our IPR. You went ahead and copied the
>>
>> ontology-summit team's work-in-progress without their consent; and worse,
>>
>> despite the author's specific request to you to hold off until we publish,
>>
>> you went ahead and published that on your site even before our team has
>>
>> released that work and publish it themselves. This is not the kind of
>>
>> behavior we expect from "trusted members" of the community at all.
>>
>>
>>
>> PLEASE STOP YOUR INFRINGEMENT.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>>
>> Peter Yim
>>
>> --
>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Brand Niemann <bniemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you. I looked at your work and think it is similar to what I am
>>
>>> trying to do:
>>
>>>
>>
>>> http://semanticommunity.info/AOL_Government/Ontology_Summit_2012_Commu
>>
>>> nique#Ontology
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (05)
|