Dear Anders,
Sorry, I’m not aware I was talking about any temporal ordering. Please explain.
Regards
Matthew West
Information Junction
Tel: +44 560 302 3685
Mobile: +44 750 3385279
Skype: dr.matthew.west
matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 6632177.
Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.
From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Tell
Sent: 05 February 2011 15:23
To: Ontology Summit 2011 discussion
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] [Making the Case] Elevator Pitch
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Matthew West wrote:
I wonder do we really need this? If we examine the situation a little closer then reasons for variability appears.
Legislation forces different point of views across border and inside countries.
MW: This means of course that you really mean different things in those different circumstances, so they should not be the same.
Product: there a quite a few work perspective that view Product differently from different point-of-view and so it is likely to be. The need for specialization of work perspectives seems to be inevitable in larger organizations.
... more than 10+ major reasons for large scale variability can easily be found.
MW: Yes. In my book “Developing High Quality Data Models” I identify a number of these. But that just means that these are different things, not the same.
MW: Moral, first identify what is the same/different, then apply the above.
AWT: Im intrigued, identity is important but why is there a temporal ordering between the two? could you elaborate on the raionale?