|From:||William Frank <williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:44:44 -0800|
Yes, this is the essence of good engineering work, in my opinion, keep it simple, by hiding complexity in packages. I merely add two examples.|
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:14 AM, John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/29/2012 3:40 PM, Tom Knorr wrote:
If this well known observation were universally adopted, then there could be a simple way of relating logics and language semantics, alot more easily than MOF, for example.
For example, "the magic number seven plus or minus two."
In any case, practical experience in computer science and systems
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] doing standards [was - Re: Webby objects], Matthew West|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Concepts, ontologies, and natural languages, Ali SH|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Concepts, ontologies, and natural languages, John F Sowa|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Concepts, ontologies, and natural languages, Ali SH|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|