[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology

To: <edbark@xxxxxxxx>, "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Patrick Cassidy" <pat@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:04:26 -0500
Message-id: <02f001c98c7b$8edf8890$ac9e99b0$@com>
> Pat Cassidy wrote:
> >>>  Portion of that cost that could be reduced by a common foundation
> >>> ontology: 1/5 (20 billion per year)
> Pat Hayes wrote:
> >> Here's where we disagree. I suggest that the correct proportion here
> >> would be more like 0.01 percent. Not because it wouldn't work if
> >> people would all use it, but because people will not in fact use it.
> Matthew West wrote:
> > [MW] That is of course still more than we could think of how to spend.
> [PH]  I make that 10M$. I thought PatC was talking about 30M$.
>    (01)

  CALO was funded at over 200M.  It seems you lack imagination.
  More to the point, the cost is needed to provide serious time for the 100
participants to find the translations among their different systems.    (02)

Pat    (03)

Patrick Cassidy
cell: 908-565-4053
cassidy@xxxxxxxxx    (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>