To: | "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Patrick Cassidy" <pat@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:52:47 -0500 |
Message-id: | <029801c98c69$2ac6dbe0$805493a0$@com> |
Question: [PH] > > > > Portion of that cost that could be reduced by a common foundation > > ontology: 1/5 (20 billion per year) > > Here's where we disagree. I suggest that the correct proportion here > would be more like 0.01 percent. Not because it wouldn't work if > people would all use it, but because people will not in fact use it. > > Pat H. > (01) What do you think that people *would* use that would provide them accurate semantic interoperability? (02) Patrick Cassidy MICRA, Inc. 908-561-3416 cell: 908-565-4053 cassidy@xxxxxxxxx (03) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology, Patrick Cassidy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Relationship: n-ary vs binary, Azamat |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology, Patrick Cassidy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology, Ed Barkmeyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |