On Monday, January 12, 2009 9:27 AM, John wrote: (01)
"The people who subscribe to ontolog-forum have expressed a great deal of
knowledge about and interest in such issues. They should
be encouraged to participate. But the participants in the registry project
need not be identical to the set of subscribers to ontolog-forum." (02)
Anybody who is feeling that he can effectively contribute to the cause of
Global Federate Ontology is to be welcomed. For the contributions are
largely of two kinds:
1. the core federal ontologies;
2. an extensive number of federated ontologies, domain knowledge bases,
lexicons, subject classification systems, large-scale databases, etc. (03)
Azamat Abdoullaev (04)
----- Original Message -----
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Next steps in using ontologies as standards (05)
> Azamat and Ron,
>
> There are two separate issues:
>
> 1. Developing the ground rules and policies for an ontology
> registry.
>
> 2. Setting up a registry and maintaining the contributed ontologies.
>
> These two goals can be pursued in parallel, but #1 should be started
> first. Then an implementation, #2, would give us further experience
> and ideas about how to develop #1 further.
>
> RW> I have used MediaWiki (Wikipedia's wiki tool) for a couple of
> > sites and it is easy to set up and fairly intuitive to use.
>
> That could be a reasonable way to get started.
>
> RW> We could also just do this on the Wikipedia site if they do
> > not object to the amount of pages that this would add.
>
> The goals, procedures, and ultimate product are very different
> from the Wikipedia, so it would be better to keep it separate,
> although some of the Wikipedia tools may be useful.
>
> AA> I'd agree, being grateful for this, if the ontolog-forum has
> > problem with this. But what about other "stakeholders"?
>
> The people who subscribe to ontolog-forum have expressed a great
> deal of knowledge about and interest in such issues. They should
> be encouraged to participate. But the participants in the
> registry project need not be identical to the set of subscribers
> to ontolog-forum.
>
> John
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
|