ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Fw: Next steps in using ontologies as standards

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rich Cooper" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:39:00 -0800
Message-id: <20090107003938.DE8FB138CC7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Agreed.  Lex and Yacc solved the logistical problem of interpreting syntax
rule sets on static lexical tokens without writing a lot of code.
Otherwise, very little productivity gain was made by using them.  The Gries
book (and others like it) did a whole lot more to show people how to
organize compilers and interpreters though.      (01)

-Rich    (02)


Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com    (03)


-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Francis McCabe
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:20 PM
To: edbark@xxxxxxxx; [ontolog-forum] 
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Fw: Next steps in using ontologies as standards    (04)

Could not help jumping in on this one ed...    (05)

Having written more than 12 compilers in my time; I would have to  
state that lex and yacc 'solve' an extremely small part of the  
problem. So small that I actually rarely use them...    (06)

Frank    (07)

On Jan 6, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Ed Barkmeyer wrote:    (08)

>
> One other note:  What really made compilers a "commodity" was:
> - Dave Gries's book in 1972 that taught children all the basics of
> compiler writing that we professionals had struggled to learn in the
> 1960s; and
> - yacc and lex, Unix-based freeware tools of 1976 that allowed the
> programmer to write a grammar and generated a C implementation of the
> parser for it, leaving the user to complete the semantic stubs.  Yes,
> you had to learn something about symbol tables and code generation --
> read Gries.
>
> My NIST predecessor in the Pascal standards effort, Justin Walker,  
> used
> yacc and lex to write a Pascal compiler/interpreter, with almost no
> previous background in compiler writing.    (09)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (010)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>