ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Event Planning [was - Re: electric sheep]

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:55:17 +0700
Message-id: <c09b00eb0709041955j31749316wea065675d0a34c22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Peter
thanks a lot for your extensive reply    (01)

What about adding a chapter/paragraph to the wiki with process guidelines about
'how to organize a talk', or 'how to be invited to give a talk'
so that people can put forward their ideas and suggestions for future sessions?    (02)

A suggestion could be that anyone organizing a talk, would make an
open invitationt
to others who may want to present around the same topic, as to create
'topic clusters'
and get different perspectives on the same topic ( eating our own framework)
This could be mentioned in the guidelines    (03)

Great that vendors are not encouraged, but somehow 'selling' manages to slip in    (04)

great work!
cheers    (05)

Paola DM    (06)



On 9/5/07, Peter P. Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote Tue, 4 Sep 2007 23:14:31 +0700:
> > ...[snip]...
> >
> > [PDM]  do we have a formal way to suggesting/voting for sessions? how
> > are these sessions chosen?how do we know how many people are
> > interested in a topic? could we have a 'call for sessions' where people
> > can submit their talks and then maybe have more than one speaker
> > present around the same topic, to have a plurality of views and enrich
> > the discourse?
>
> For those who are new to the community, our regular weekly
> conference calls are on Thursdays starting 10:30am PDT / 1:30pm
> EDT / 6:30pm BST / 7:30pm CEST / 17:30 GMT/UTC (adjusted back to
> PST & EST when the US gets off daylight saving time.)
>
> When we don't have a scheduled events (like an invited talk or
> panel discussion), we will, by default, use that slot for (what
> we call) our "regular operations planning and review meeting"
> where active members of the community get together and review our
> activities and well being, suggest new ideas, corrective actions,
> etc. etc. These calls are only announced on the wiki (under "News
> and Announcements" (in order not to create additional mail
> traffic), but everyone who cares is welcomed to join in. One can
>   also send in his/her idea(s) for discussion, through the
> mailing list or the wiki session page, in absentia.
>
> Practically all Ontolog initiatives are community driven. The
> best way to make something happen is to (i) announce the idea,
> (ii) get enough people to support and idea (and be willing to
> work on it), (iii) create a project/initiative, form a team,
> appoint a champion and (iv) then go do it. The champion of an
> initiative is generally trusted with making the calls and seeing
> to it that we have a top quality program.
>
> In the past, new initiatives, projects, programs, etc. generally
> come out of these discussions, or from ideas informally brought
> up in the discussion list. And, without exception, champions of
> all past initiatives have made open calls to the entire community
> for participation (as team members, as presenters, etc.)
>
> That's the informal way things get done around here. The formal
> way is documented under:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1Y ...
> both should work, but of course, the formal way is normative.
>
>
>  > [PDM]  I wonder For example, if vendor a can come up and
>  > sell their stoffe, it would be only fair if vendor b
>  > could do the same... and to balance the vendor perspective,
>  > we could have users, observers, researchers, all providing
>  > their perspective (which now they can do in form of questions
>  > and answers, but it does not get captured as being part of
>  > the topic, merely follow up) just ideas  .. cheers, PDM
>
> By default we intend to keep our distance from commercial
> vending, as discussed earlier - see:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2007-09/msg00031.html#nid02
>
> ... commercial products and vending have slightly different
> objectives from what we are chartered to do. "Selling" is
> probably better done elsewhere, than over the settings of a
> purely volunteered (and community donated) effort that we operate
> on here.
>
>
> Regards.  =ppy
>
> Peter Yim
> Co-convener, Ontolog
> --
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>    (07)


-- 
Paola Di Maio
School of IT
www.mfu.ac.th
*********************************************    (08)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (09)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>