>
>In engineering terms, this is equivalent to saying that if we are to
>build a common enterprise, we must do due diligence to ensure what we
>are talking about the same thing. This is not simply a matter of
>checking we have the same labels for the same concepts, but actually
>check that we have the same systematisation of the conceptual landscape.
> (01)
Absolutely. I don't think anyone who has worked in ontology
engineering or AI or Krep would disagree for a moment. We are all
vividly aware of the need for this kind of vigilance. There are
several methodologies available for trying to maintain it, including
various techniques of 'knowledge extraction'. The fallacy of thinking
that because a formal concept is labelled, say, 'human', that it
therefore corresponds to anyone's actual concept of what "human"
means, has been given a label in AI/KR work: it is called the 'gensym
fallacy'. We teach it to undergraduate students, usually in their
senior year. (02)
Pat
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|