Thank you, Peter. (01)
John (Domingue), (02)
Any chance you could come join us at one of our regular calls to
explore this further? Our next call is coming up this Thursday
23-Jun-2005. I'll send you an "invitation" to the call. (You can
also see the agenda and other details at:
Best regards. =ppy
Peter F Brown wrote Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:01:42 +0200:
> Peter, Duane:
> I don't feel competent to lead any discussion on WSMO myself, but I could
> suggest John Domingue (in copy) of the Knowledge Media Institute at the Open
> University in the UK, who presented in Innsbruck.
> Kind regards,
> -Peter F Brown (05)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Yim
> Sent: 16 June 2005 17:08
> To: [ontolog-forum]
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Modeling Ontology
> > [DN] M. Yim, would you consider placing an subject on our > next agenda
> [ppy] Will do, Duane. I'll make sure that gets onto the agenda of the Thu
> 2005.06.23 ontolog call.
> Peter Brown (anyone else, too), would there be a good candidate you can
> On a related note (guess quite a few of you might have caught this too) ...
> the following was posted to the [protege-discussion] list:
> To: protege-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: Michael Shepherd <mshepherd -at- xeroxlabs dot com>
> Subject: [protege-discussion] SWSF
> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:54:18 +0000 (UTC)
> Hi all,
> Are there any activities in regards to Protege and the new Semantic Web
> Services Framework (SWSF) that the DAML group has been working? SWSL, FLOWS
> and ROWS appear to be an alternative to OWL and OWL-S, but industry support
> seems minimal at this point given that v1.0 was just released last month.
> There is also some discussion on the DAML site about synergy and backward
> compatibility with OWL mainly via WSML. Can someone perhaps enlighten me
> about how these standards inter-relate?
> Guess there are others who would want to find out too!
> Cheers. =ppy
> -- (06)
> Duane Nickull wrote ed, 15 Jun 2005 11:39:25 -0700:
>>Thank you Peter, Nicolas.
>>M. Yim, would you consider placing an subject on our next agenda to
>>discuss a possible invitation to the gentlemen below to present to our
>>Peter F Brown wrote Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:48:38 +0200:
>>>WSMO was presented in detail last week at the W3 semantic web
>>>services workshop in Innsbruck, Austria - WSMO's "home base", as it
>>>is largely promoted by the Innsbruck-based Digital Enterprise
>>>Research Institute (DERI), with considerable support from the European
>>>There is some concern about the pressure being mounted by DERI to
>>>have WSMO "adopted as a standard" (although not clear by whom: W3C?).
>>>The European Commission will be looking at this over the coming
>>>There is a good overview of WSMO at:
>>>http://www.w3.org/2005/04/FSWS/Submissions/1/wsmo_v10.pdf used at the
>>>workshop. It might be worth contacting John Domingue from the UK Open
>>>University, who made the presentation, and with whom I had a couple
>>>of bried talks during the activity.
>>>[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Duane
>>>Sent: 11 June 2005 01:18
>>>Subject: [ontolog-forum] Modeling Ontology
>>>Anyone have any comments or thoughts on this:
>>>Might be an idea to extend an invite for a presentation.
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)