[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Modeling Ontology

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:07:51 -0700
Message-id: <42B195C7.9020808@xxxxxxxx>
 > [DN] M. Yim, would you consider placing an subject on our
 > next agenda ...    (01)

[ppy] Will do, Duane. I'll make sure that gets onto the agenda of 
the Thu 2005.06.23 ontolog call.    (02)

Peter Brown (anyone else, too), would there be a good candidate 
you can recommend.    (03)

On a related note (guess quite a few of you might have caught 
this too) ... the following was posted to the 
[protege-discussion] list:    (04)

To: protege-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Michael Shepherd <mshepherd -at- xeroxlabs dot com>
Subject: [protege-discussion]  SWSF
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:54:18 +0000 (UTC)    (05)

Hi all,    (06)

Are there any activities in regards to Protege and the new 
Semantic Web Services Framework (SWSF) that the DAML group has 
been working?  SWSL, FLOWS and ROWS appear to be an alternative 
to OWL and OWL-S, but industry support seems minimal at this 
point given that v1.0 was just released last month.  There is 
also some discussion on the DAML site about synergy and backward 
compatibility with OWL mainly via WSML.  Can someone perhaps 
enlighten me about how these standards inter-relate?    (07)

//    (08)

Guess there are others who would want to find out too!    (09)

Cheers.  =ppy
--    (010)

Duane Nickull wrote ed, 15 Jun 2005 11:39:25 -0700:
> Thank you Peter, Nicolas.
> M. Yim, would you consider placing an subject on our next agenda to 
> discuss a possible invitation to the gentlemen below to present to our 
> Group?
> Duane    (011)

> Peter F Brown wrote Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:48:38 +0200:
>> Duane:
>> WSMO was presented in detail last week at the W3 semantic web services
>> workshop in Innsbruck, Austria - WSMO's "home base", as it is largely
>> promoted by the Innsbruck-based Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> (DERI), with considerable support from the European Commission.
>> There is some concern about the pressure being mounted by DERI to have 
>> "adopted as a standard" (although not clear by whom: W3C?). The European
>> Commission will be looking at this over the coming months.
>> There is a good overview of WSMO at:
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/04/FSWS/Submissions/1/wsmo_v10.pdf used at the
>> workshop. It might be worth contacting John Domingue from the UK Open
>> University, who made the presentation, and with whom I had a couple of 
>> bried
>> talks during the activity.
>> -Peter    (012)

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Duane 
>> Nickull
>> Sent: 11 June 2005 01:18
>> To: [ontolog-forum]
>> Subject: [ontolog-forum] Modeling Ontology
>> Anyone have any comments or thoughts on this:
>> http://www.w3.org/Submission/2005/SUBM-WSMO-20050603/
>> Might be an idea to extend an invite for a presentation.
>> Duane Nickull
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (013)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>