[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Context, at last!

To: Nicolas F Rouquette <nicolas.rouquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:27:13 -0500
Message-id: <20050621002713.GC44275@xxxxxxxx>
I don't know what is going on with this tendency of mine to omit "not"
from critical points in my examples....Perhaps it's because I'm just not
a terribly negative person! ;-)    (01)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:24:22PM -0500, Chris Menzel wrote:
> > What does it mean to use a *single* framework for representing
> > multiple ontologies according to different contexts or some other
> > criteria? 
> Roughly, a framework in which one can say such things as "According to
> ontology 01, nuclear plant P has adequate security, but according to
> ontology 02 P does ...    (02)

...*not*...    (03)

> have adequate security."      (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>