I don't know what is going on with this tendency of mine to omit "not"
from critical points in my examples....Perhaps it's because I'm just not
a terribly negative person! ;-) (01)
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:24:22PM -0500, Chris Menzel wrote:
> > What does it mean to use a *single* framework for representing
> > multiple ontologies according to different contexts or some other
> > criteria?
> Roughly, a framework in which one can say such things as "According to
> ontology 01, nuclear plant P has adequate security, but according to
> ontology 02 P does ... (02)
> have adequate security." (04)
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)