To: | Ontology Summit 2014 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Andrea Westerinen <arwesterinen@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:57:38 -0500 |
Message-id: | <CALThp9msqOX+oOvHNYCeRPp_6g3GG+e9V40h9Lk+pYDH_zKntg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
John and John,
In as much as the "integrating" ontology is an "ontology about ontologies (and their concepts)" ... yes, it is a meta-ontology. However, I find that people handle the term, "integrating ontology", much better. And, it conveys the purpose (as opposed to being open-ended).
Given that some of my customers view ontologies with some skepticism (they call ontology, the "o-word"), I much prefer avoiding adding scary modifiers onto a scary word. (That is just my experience.)
Andrea On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:38 PM, John McClure <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] The tools are not the problem (yet), Barkmeyer, Edward J |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] OWl and Knowledge reuse via import and modularization, Andrea Westerinen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontolog Ontology of Ontologies, John McClure |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontolog Ontology of Ontologies, Hans Polzer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |