To: | Ontology Summit 2014 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Andrea Westerinen <arwesterinen@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:08:40 -0500 |
Message-id: | <CALThp9niaY7FeF9BqX9CtdrJ4Nh_1Nrm5y4DB-=gwjsNTDz8qw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Ed and John, I have to agree with Ed's statement. I have and continue to use OWL (+ SWRL) since they allow me to define the concepts and calculations that I need + with a reasoner, I can actually do something with all that logic. So, the formalisms plus the tools make it attractive and usable, and I don't have to "roll my own". Is this the only solution or only space where the concepts work? No, but in this space, it works well. Andrea On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Barkmeyer, Edward J <edward.barkmeyer@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontolog Ontology of Ontologies, Andrea Westerinen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontolog Ontology of Ontologies, Hans Polzer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] OWl and Knowledge reuse via import and modularization, Barkmeyer, Edward J |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] OWl and Knowledge reuse via import and modularization, John F Sowa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |