| Joe:   Difference is a function (must return value) - agree.  What is value V=diff(Math, BS and SoS) ?   "Common sense" (wiki) explains 
that "difference 
is opposed to identity"  and that  
"The notion of identity gives rise to many philosophical problems, including the 
identity of indiscernibles (if x and y share all their properties, are they one 
and the same thing?), and questions about change and personal identity over time 
(what has to be the case for a person x at one time and a person y at a later 
time to be one and the same person?)."
   The measure and units are very important, of 
course   1 + 1 = 2 Anybody agree   1 John + 1 John = 2 
John It's funny :)   Have fun Yuri   
  ----- Original Message -----  Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 5:13 
  PM Subject: Re: 
  [ontology-summit][BigSystemsandSystemsEngineering]Systemofsystems Yuriy:
 
 The difference is a function of the units of 
  measure, context of evaluation and the sensitivity of the measuring 
  instrument.
 
 Have fun,
 
 Joe
 
 
 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Yuriy Milov <qdone@xxxxxxxxxx>  
  wrote:
   
    
    Joe:   What is the difference 
    between Mathematics and Big Systems and Systems 
    Engineering?   Kronecker said "God 
    made integers; all else is the work of man" 
       I agree :)   Not sure if musiciants and poets should learn from 
    math (why not?) but the engineers must. Math can teach how to manage 
    the big systems and SoS. No need to invent bicycles. Most of problems and 
    solutions have been formalized and semanticly vocabularied in the 
    proper math fiels (complexity theory, chaos theory, nonlinear equations, so 
    far, so on). What we need is just apply that formalized math knowledge 
    in our computerized world. Just making software. It's 
    not a big deal - it's just a question of 
    money.   But what was not solved by mathematics for 
    free that cannot be solved any other way except of by magic 
    :)   And this is already out of the Ontology 
    Summit topic   Regards Yuri         
      
      ----- Original Message -----  
      
      Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:56 
      PM Subject: Re: 
      [ontology-summit][BigSystemsandSystemsEngineering]Systemofsystems 
 Yuriy: Because the name of this track is Big Systems 
      and Systems Engineering this topic fits under the topic of mathematics (a 
      very big system). However, engineering in general is a bit 
      different and systems engineering is even more 
      different. Engineering is the act of applying mathematics and 
      scientific principles to the solution of practical problems. So, 
      math is a tool used by engineers to solve problems. Then there are 
      systems science and metasystems methodology that set the context for the 
      application of systems engineering. There is little or no magic 
      involved in these well defined approaches and processes for designing, 
      developing, deploying and operating large-scale systems. However, 
      as Arthur C. Clarke detailed in his three laws, "Any sufficiently advanced 
      technology is indistinguishable from magic." In my mind we are 
      discussing a very advanced technology that integrates large stores of 
      data, information and technology. It is not magic. Take care 
      and have fun, Joe
       2012/2/3 Yuriy Milov <qdone@xxxxxxxxxx> 
        
        Hi Joe,   If a () system of () systems 
        exists then a (very (simple)) system is still a system of 
        (very (very (simple))) system.     It's amaizing 
        to know a very simple system which demonstrates very 
        complex behavior. This is a fantastic 
        gift. We do not deserv it - but we have it! :)   We could think that the natural numbers 
        (1,2,3,4,5,6,7.. so on) is simple. Are we sure?   Let's choose a natural number  n1 (free, 
        spontaneously, without any reasons - just any of natural 
        numbers) and  then let's choose again any natural number n2  (free, 
        spontaneously, without any reasons - just any of natural 
        numbers).   The more freedom of choice we have - the more 
        chances that n2>n1    Absolute freedom of choice makes n2>n1 
        guaranteed   The reason of this is that there is no a biggest 
        natural number (that is also an amazing fact, by the way)   We (people) are finite (in space and 
        time) pretty simple entities. How can we understand infinity? 
           The answer is - because ae are able to play with 
        a freedom of choice - thanks for the great gift - the natural 
        numbers :)    The  
        logistic equations and cellular automata are magic wands whaich 
        transform complex system of systems in a simple set 1,2,3 and so on 
        :)   Yuri     
          
          ----- Original Message -----  
          Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 
          3:29 AM Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] 
          [BigSystemsandSystemsEngineering]Systemofsystems 
 The logistic equation is a math model of the behavior 
          of a living system. A very simple system can demonstrate very 
          complex behavior. In my view this is another example of general 
          systems theory (GST) where a specific branch of science was 
          generalized into mathematics and applied in many 
          places. However, this is behavior of a simple system, not a 
          system of systems or an industrial system. Have 
          fun, Joe
           On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Yuriy Milov 
          <qdone@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
           Hi Jack,
 I think the metod is to follow the 
            cascade of bifurcation which has the
 universal mesure (a sort of 
            the delta number which can be got 
            from
 experiment/experience)
 
 The magics here is our ability 
            to distinguish the related and unrelated
 events -  where the 
            bifurcated branchs (splitted paths) belongs one tree
 (one 
            way)
 
 Sorry if it is too vague methafora - I do some urgent 
            job right now
 
 Yuri
 
 
 
 _________________________________________________________________
 Msg 
        Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
 Subscribe/Config: 
        http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
 Unsubscribe: 
        mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Community 
        Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
 Community 
        Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
 Community 
        Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
 
 
--  Joe Simpson Sent From My 
      DROID!! 
 
 _________________________________________________________________
 Msg 
    Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
 Subscribe/Config: 
    http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
 Unsubscribe: 
    mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Community 
    Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
 Community 
    Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
 Community 
    Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
 
 
 
 --
 Joe Simpson
 
 Sent From My DROID!!
 
 
   
 _________________________________________________________________
 Msg 
  Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
 Subscribe/Config: 
  http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
 Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Community 
  Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
 Community 
  Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
 
 |