|To:||doug@xxxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||William Frank <williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:21:12 -0400|
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, doug foxvog <doug@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, September 26, 2012 17:03, John F Sowa wrote:
If a body is a *part* of an animal, what is the other part??? If you want to use "part" differently from English, in which language, a car is *not* a part of the car, nor is a beach a part of that same beach, that is fine, too.
*A physical animal that lives and has a body as its complete physical
part is a useful concept.
??? So, one part of an animal is its complete physical part, and there is some other part, that is not part of its complete physical part????
Also, to explore this ramble a bit, what in the world is philosophical game playing? I guess it must not include statements like *, so, by contrast, maybe it is thinking and expressing oneself very carefully. And, why are you guessing what else someone might believe (and I am guessing your guess is incorrect) and arguing about *that* in an email to this forum, as you do for some many more rambles?
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, John Bottoms|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, Andries van Renssen|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, doug foxvog|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, John F Sowa|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|