ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontologist Aptitude Test?

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Cameron Ross <cross@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:26:05 -0500
Message-id: <-6323523438483353123@unknownmsgid>
This site has all kinds of information re: the SWEBoK:
http://www.computer.org/portal/web/swebok
.  Is this not what the 2010 summit is attempting to map out for the
ontologist of the future?    (01)

Cameron.    (02)

Sent from my iPhone    (03)

On Dec 18, 2009, at 5:09 PM, "Schiffel, Jeffrey A"
<jeffrey.a.schiffel@xxxxxxxxxx
 > wrote:    (04)

>> From: Ed Barkmeyer
>>
>> I don't know how to teach knowledge engineering skills; so I can't
>> imagine developing an abstract test for them.
>> I suppose that, since one can now be a Certified UML Modeler, one
>> could probably be a Certified OWL Modeler.  OTOH, the relationship
>> between Certified OWL Modeler and "ontologist aptitude" is unknown.
>
> This is the key to developing an OAT. Rather than first developing
> the test, instead create an Ontologist Body of Knowledge. From them,
> several items follow, including an aptitude test.
>
> The steps in order are these:
>
> 1. Build an OBoK.
> 2. Build a training curriculum.
> 3. Build a certification test.
> 4. Build an aptitude test.
>
> To get started, here are just a few possible OBoK topics:
>
> - Training and years of experience in use of logic, including FOL
> and modal logics. Applied use, such as SQL or DL.
>
> - Training and years of experience in conceptual structures,
> including graphical tools and formal notations like XML, UML, many
> others.
>
> - Use of ontology tools, ranging from general purpose tools (e.g.,
> databases and Protégé) to specialized ontology tools.
>
> - Training or skill in general systems theory.
>
> - Training in algebraic methods such as trees and digraphs,
> lattices, and similar group structures, and in graph theory.
>
> - Knowledge of an "ontology life cycle," to include designing an
> maintaining individual or coupled ontologies.
>
> - Basic principles of syntax, semantics, semiotics.
>
>> From topics such as these, not only can a OBoK and an
>> accomplishments test be developed, but also a training curriculum.
>> Once these three exist, an aptitude test should be simple to
>> formulate.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Jeff Schiffel
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    (05)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>