----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Barkmeyer" <edbark@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics (01)
JFS
>> Yes, but the basic primitives of core CL are very simple
>> and very general. Defining multiple logics by the mapping
>> to one standard logic with a solid model theory automatically
>> insures that all of them are mutually compatible.
>
EB
> This is certainly a laudable goal, but
> (1) it wasn't the topic I thought we were discussing, and
> (2) it only works for FOL languages. For logic programming languages,
> you just don't have all the necessary semantic concepts in CL. (And I
> don't know what kind of language mKR really is.)
>
RHM
After reading "Logic for Interoperability" in the "IKL Guide", it appears
that IKL is a subset of today's mKR language, because I don't enforce
the restrictions described in that section.
***** to be continued as I read further ***** (02)
Dick (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|