[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics

To: "edbark@xxxxxxxx" <edbark@xxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:33:53 -0700
Message-id: <C5E80851.38F5%dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
On 3/19/09 2:23 PM, "Ed Barkmeyer" <edbark@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
 (a) most of the lock-in technology is added features that the standard
doesn't specify at all; and

Have you ever tried to write one CSS file and see it works across all browsers?  It is a frustrating and difficult job.   I saw something very funny on this the other day and submitted it to SlashDot.  It made the front page:

"Microsoft is tracking incompatible Web sites for its upcoming Internet Explorer 8 browser and has posted a list that now contains about 2,400 names — including Microsoft.com. Apparently, even though Microsoft's IE8 team is doing the 'right' thing by finally making IE more standards-compliant, they are risking 'breaking the Web' because the vast majority of Web sites are still written to work correctly with previous, non-standards-compliant versions of IE."



Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>