To: | "edbark@xxxxxxxx" <edbark@xxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:33:53 -0700 |
Message-id: | <C5E80851.38F5%dnickull@xxxxxxxxx> |
Ed: On 3/19/09 2:23 PM, "Ed Barkmeyer" <edbark@xxxxxxxx> wrote: (a) most of the lock-in technology is added features that the standard Have you ever tried to write one CSS file and see it works across all browsers? It is a frustrating and difficult job. I saw something very funny on this the other day and submitted it to SlashDot. It made the front page: "Microsoft is tracking incompatible Web sites for its upcoming Internet Explorer 8 browser and has posted a list that now contains about 2,400 names — including Microsoft.com. Apparently, even though Microsoft's IE8 team is doing the 'right' thing by finally making IE more standards-compliant, they are risking 'breaking the Web' because the vast majority of Web sites are still written to work correctly with previous, non-standards-compliant versions of IE." http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/19/2056228 D _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics, Ed Barkmeyer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontolog-forum] N3+, an N3-variant for units, Joel Bender |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics, Ed Barkmeyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics, Ed Barkmeyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |