This is an open forum, and the discussions have been vigorous
and informal, often like those in a college dorm around midnight. One difference
is the fact that these discussions are being recorded for all time for the
public to observe, so one would *hope* for some caution in expressing
negative opinions . Still, if one member thinks that another’s
contribution is truly stupid, I would not want to see any inhibition on
_expression_ of such an opinion. We know the kinds of strong opinions that can
be advanced here, and if any of us has a skin too thin to tolerate direct
insult, I would suggest that such members not participate (or, alternatively,
advance only opinion for which there is strong citation support). As one
who has been called “mad”, I find the debate exhilarating and
amusing, even when I am on the receiving end.
I hope we stay wide open, and leave censorship to the contributors
themselves, except in extreme cases of persistent disruptive posts.
Pat
Patrick Cassidy
MICRA, Inc.
908-561-3416
cell: 908-565-4053
cassidy@xxxxxxxxx
From:
ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tolk,
Andreas
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 1:39 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Tighter control of ontolog forum?
I
think that someone who "deliberately and gratuitously
insults other forum members" or "openly insult others'" violates
not only the code of ethics but also the principles for professional conduct.
Unfortunately, the level of education and the rank in academic institutions
does not imply social or ethical maturity. I am quite sure that I am myself
guilty of having insulted someone with my statements (maybe currently even am
in the process of doing so), but the "deliberately and gratuitously"
is what raises my concern.
It
is OK to openly discuss ideas, and there should be no limiting factor. If an
idea is stupid or not of interest it will simply dry out over time. It is also
OK to say - or better prove - that someone is wrong. No-one is served by
something that is wrong. The open discussion has been the core of academic
progress, and academic disputes are healthy for the discipline. However, it is
not OK to attack others in an unprofessional way and to personally attack
someone.
My
two pence ... my question: do we need to take action here?
====================
;-)
Andreas Tolk, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Engineering Management & Systems Engineering
Old Dominion University
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx
[paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:30 AM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Tighter control of ontolog forum?
|
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|