[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Scheduling a Discussion [was: CL, CG, IKL and the re

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "John Black" <JohnBlack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 06:50:21 -0500
Message-id: <02bf01c84f91$26bd46d0$6601a8c0@KASHORI001>
on Wed. Jan. 02, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Peter Yim wrote:    (01)

>> [DN]  Would make an interesting ontolog session sometimes in 2008.
>> Maybe Peter can schedule a call.    (02)

+1  that it would make an interesting session.    (03)

> [ppy] Sure, I'd be most happy to. I'd need a more refined statement of
> WHAT (exactly) it is, that folks would like to discuss, and WHO are
> the people they would like to hear from (or hear discussing the issue
> at hand).    (04)

Brainstorming topic suggestions:
Resolved: The word "Context" in ontological engineering talk has become 
useless and should be replaced (Pro and Con). For those on the Pro side: 
recommend use of one or more terms or phrases to use to discuss technology 
already used and referred to by "context".   For those on the Con side: 
provide a concise and formal explanation of what thread connects different 
uses of the word "context", including time and belief.    (05)

Brainstorming people suggestions (alphabetically by last name):
Ramanathan Guha, Pat Hayes, John McCarthy, Chris Menzel, Duane Nickull, John 
Sowa,...    (06)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (07)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>