ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Terminology Question concerning WebArchitecture and

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Azamat Abdoullaev" <abdoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:06:42 +0300
Message-id: <00b201c7ce15$0228c590$030aa8c0@az00evbfog6nhh>
 Azamat,
> To assume that everyone will think about things in the same way is neither
> desirable nor probable.    (01)

Denise,
This is your assumption, not mine, i believe, to start your argument. Let me 
repeat what i wrote to you:    (02)

''A global ontology has nothing to do with a single world view forcefully
imposed on you free mind, but rather a comprehensive and consistent
representation of dynamic, ever changing reality, integrating, aligning, all
valuable views, paradigms, models, theories, as well the particular
ontologies.''
Let listen to each other. Otherwise, as Kathryn says: we  ''can yell at each 
other till the cows come home, and there will be no way to tell who is 
right.''    (03)

Best wishes,
Azamat    (04)



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Terminology Question concerning WebArchitecture 
and LinkedData    (05)


> Azamat,
>
> To assume that everyone will think about things in the same way is neither
> desirable nor probable.  In Los Altos, CA grocery stores may organize food 
> by
> "events" - breakfast, lunch, dinner, etc.   In Washington DC grocery 
> stores
> organize food by 'food groups' - vegetables, bakery, beverages, dairy. 
> There is
> no single way to define classes of food that works for everyone and there 
> need
> not be.  There are many equally valid options depending on the actors and 
> the
> context.
>
> On a practical level, not everything fits into classes.  Hierarchies and 
> class
> schemes are one of the most restrictive data structures, and while there 
> is an
> inherent logic - it does not cover much of what an ontology really needs 
> to
> address (in my humble opinion).
>
> Logical inheritance based on classes assignment is also a basic assumption 
> that
> I think should be critically and openly debated in the ontology community.
> Perhaps it has been, and I've missed the discussion.
>
> Best regards,
> Denise
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>     (06)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (07)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>