Peter, (01)
Your description captures some of the categories that were proposed last year.
I agree that there is a need for contextualizing any entries, and that there is
a need for clear process. (02)
I like the idea of having a "content" oriented glossary rather than the
postings. The postings are impossible to follow for someone like me who has an
18+ hour a day job. I think we need to have collaboration around descriptive
content, rather than a discussion thread as we have now, if we want to make
progress in this area. Especially, if we want to invite a larger community to
participate. They're not going to take the time to follow the discussion
threads -- too time consuming. (03)
Best regards,
Denise (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|