At 11:43 AM 6/14/2007, Cassidy, Patrick J. wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7AE89.EE9F745D" (01)
Pat Cassidy wrote: (02)
>Paola,
> I feel your pain.
> I believe that "concept" in most communities is used as a vague
> non-technical term that means "any mental structure used in thinking", (03)
Don Conklin wrote:
>How do I describe the idea of a design*
>produced by the organization* that satisfies a customers mission
>statement* as they compete in a economic marketspace* to reach their
>annual goals*
>
> * = subclass of Concept (04)
So for Pat, "concept" in most communities means "mental structure".
I think Pat is right, for some communities at least. (05)
For Don "concept" subsumes "mission statement", "economic
marketspace", and "annual goal".
Others contributing to this list have used "concept" in a way similar
to Don (roughly, to embrace anything non-physical). (06)
Houston, we have a problem here.
BS (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|