Adam Pease wrote: (01)
> Michael,
> I didn't include that specifically on the agenda since it's not
> something that the three upper ontology representatives have yet
> agreed has merit. That would be part of the discussion on Tuesday I
> think. If we were to agree on that goal, and on some methods for
> achieving it, I would think that would be hammered out on Tuesday and
> later presented as part of the joint communique.
> (02)
Whoa ... your rather provocative phrasing totally ignores the goals
explicitly stated in the original invitation to this meeting: (03)
>The two broad goals proposed by the organizing committee are: to find
>methods to interrelate existing upper ontologies so as to permit users of
>each to reuse knowledge expressed in the others; and to increase public
>awareness of the maturity and capabilities of ontology technology for
>automating information analysis and exploitation.
> (04)
The rest of the group agrees that the first goal does indeed have merit. (05)
- michael
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit (06)
|