Re: [uos-convene] Other Approaches Too.

["Smith, Barry" <phismith@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> [Bill:] Precisely.  There has come to be an elan associated with the
> use of logic because of the relative smaller priesthood that understands
> it vs more traditional approaches.  But its just a tool and lots of
> bad things get built with good tools.  This, BTW, is a MAJOR
> engineering reason to adopt a ULO approach -- by constraining the
> "imaginations" of domain ontologists, fewer mistakes get
> made.  This has been our experience in every project we've
> done.
This is an important point -- but we will succeed in
constraining imaginations only to the degree that the adopters understand
it. Hence the ULO should be (or have a representation which is) maximally
intuitively acceptable/understandable.
Barry